Our delegate Martin is a long-time
Boston area activist who devotes
his time to issues of peace and justice. Martin left on December
31,
2002.
10) Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2003 -
Faisel Hostel, Jerusalem
JERUSALEM WALKS
The Old City Damascus Gate
The main approach from East Jerusalem is the massive Damascus
gate,
probably the most imposing of the Old City's many entrances.
Seated
well below the new city's street level, one accesses the gate
by way
of a massive semi-circle of ancient stone steps, teeming with
merchants of every variety. It is easy to picture what this space
might have looked like hundreds of years ago when, at least in
my
imagination, sellers of oriental spices, goods brought from far-off
exotic places, and local farmers vied for space and customers.
It is
not so different now, as you descend through the cacophony of
vendors
offering fresh produce (now significantly from Israeli farms),
shoes
arranged neatly in row after row on the stone steps, tables piled
high with all types of attire, house wares, candy, and more.
Your
senses are almost overwhelmed by the frenetic energy all around,
the
sounds of merchants hawking their wares, the touch of the ever-moving
bodies, and the aroma of meats cooking on open grills on the
street
above the steps.
As you enter the gate you pass
through a small enclosed area with a
handful of street vendors, some with wares simply spread on blankets
on the ground, and two indoor shops, one of which is a dealer
in
timepieces called "Big Bin's!" As you turn right through
the
passageway you emerge into the bustle of a large courtyard, lined
on
both sides with the open shops that define shopping in the Old
City.
Between them are huge pushcarts heaped high with every imaginable
type of produce arranged like tiny, middle eastern Bread and
Circuses. The sounds, sights, smells, and crush of people assault
the senses, and when you enter for the first time you must stop
for a
moment to take it all in. Across the open space are a number
of
passageways, with two "major" streets leading off into
the mysteries
of the casbah. These two streets theoretically lead you either
to
the left, into the "Muslim Quarter," or to the right,
into
the "Christian Quarter." In reality the differences
in these two
neighborhoods are subtle, at best. All of the residents and shop-
keepers are Palestinian Arabs. While the Muslim Quarter has the
most
mosques, and the Christian Quarter an amazing number of churches
and
holy places, the reality is that there are Christian holy sites
in
both, and one is hard-pressed to distinguish the specific lines.
What most defines this part of the city is the shopping. The
shops
at beginnings of all the streets and alleys are mostly filled
with a
variety of goods clearly meant for tourists, visitors, and pilgrims.
Here one can find an abundance of holy objects (mostly Christian),
camels of every size and type (olive wood, stuffed, leather),
mother
of pearl, jewelry, and souvenirs of every description, from the
wonderful to the wonderfully tacky. There is hardly anything
that
you cannot find made of olive wood, or emblazoned with "Jerusalem."
As you penetrate deeper into the labyrinth there are subtle changes.
More of the shops cater to the people who actually live in and
around
the Old City. These, I think, are far more interesting: the spice
shops, butchers, bakers, nut shops, shoe stores, clothing stores,
house wares, etc., etc., etc. Apart from the variety of goods
necessary for normal living, it is here that one can find some
wonderful and far more authentic items like clothing, carpets,
accessories, and the like. It is interesting that I remember
feeling
quite intimidated by these winding, seemingly endless paths.
And
yet, despite warnings about safety, I have felt quite comfortable
wandering.
And a word about the people.
Along with the locals shopkeepers,
shoppers, and residents there is an amazing mix of Christian
clerics of all sizes, shapes, and persuasions, pilgrims of every
description, western tourists, and Orthodox Jews (modern and,
most
vividly, Chasidim with their long coats and distinctive hats)
walking
to and from the Western Wall. (The way from some of the most
orthodox areas, including Meah Shearim, leads most directly through
Damascus Gate.) I am incredibly angry at myself for not having
reacted quickly enough the other day and missed a wonderful
photograph of a large group of Eastern Rite pilgrims in procession
near the Via Delorosa, chanting as they marched, seemingly led
by an
old Chassid with a magnificent streumil (a large, fur hat) scurrying
along in front of them. If one can put aside the infinite
stereotypes and expectations about people's politics, the visual
is
incredible. Unfortunately, on looking closely, you see that
interaction between some of these characters is, to say the least,
limited. It sometimes feels as if each "type" is walking
in a
different place than the person right beside them.
The art of oriental bargaining,
or, how many shekels can you put
through the eye of a camel?
Bargaining is one of the quintessential
parts of the oriental
market. It is quaint, has an ancient set of rules, and adds a
whole
special layer to the picturesque experience of shopping in the
Old
City. And I hate it! I hate not being able to assess the relative
value of things, I hate the way shopkeepers assault you as you
walk
through the casbah, I hate the level of hard-sell, and I hate
the
fact that, ultimately, I'm not very good at it!
As you pass the shops each proprietor
reaches out to you, welcoming
you, inviting you in to see his wares. "You are welcome,
you are
welcome. Come in, see my shop. From America? Where in America.
Oh, Boston? In Massa-shu-setts? Come in. You are Welcome. No
charge for looking. 50% off everything in the store!*. What are
you
looking for? If you don't buy, you will still be valued. If you
buy, even more!" The pitch is almost identical at each shop,
varying
only with the vendor's facility with English and ability to catch
your attention. Again, any reaction opens the possibility of
connecting intimately for the purpose of inter-cultural
communication, trust-building, and making a sale. Depending on
the
nature of the shop, you might be asked to sit and offered tea,
coffee, or a coke. All of this leaves you, as the customer, feeling
obligated in some way to make some kind of purchase. As you peruse
the olivewood camels, mother-of-pearl boxes of every size, silver
crosses, stars of David, and hamsas (good luck hands), the ceramic
plates and tiles and endless chazerei*, you try desperately to
focus
on something that you might at least be able to pawn off on some
appreciative friend back home.
Finally, you set your sights
on that cute little camel with the
twinkle in his eye. "You like this camel? I have many camels.
This
is real olive-wood, handmade near here. The best quality. You
find
cheap camels in other places. Not like this. How many you want?
Ten? Make good presents for you friends. You have no room to
carry? I ship to America." Now you cross the threshold by
uttering
the opening gambit: "How much is it?" you ask. The
experienced
buyer can now detect the almost imperceptible gleam in the seller's
eye, the twinkle that cries "I've hooked one! Now to reel
him
in!" "What difference. I give you good price. How many
you need?"
This can go on for some time, you asking the price and reiterating
that one olive-wood camel is more than any human being needs.
"You
need another size." I have medium and very big." Buy
one of each, I
give you very good price." If you are assertive enough,
eventually
he will quote a price. "Special for you, 50 shekels."
As you try to
compute that in dollars, we are now at a crucial point. Consider
the
price even if you make a counter-offer, and you're dead he knows
you know nothing. And, almost immediately, you know that he knows
that you know nothing, and all self-assurance, not to mention
self-
respect, is down the drain. But, if you are good, you will exhale
a
gust of (polite) disdain, and immediately hand the camel back
and
thank him anyway. If you are really good, you will walk out of
the
shop, not look back, and keep walking until he shouts you back.
But
this takes the steely will of an experienced haggler.
"Wait, what do you want to pay? How much you want? I make
good
price." "That's OK," you respond, "I don't
want to insult you, but
I'm looking for little gifts in the 10 shekel range." "Ten
shekels!
I must pay 30 shekels myself. The truth! I would not cheat you!
Please, I must make a little. But I need to make a sale. 40 shekels
and we are finished."
It is usually around this point
that the most difficult part of the
dance begins the "we have no business" part. You will
be told how
difficult things are because no tourists are coming, so there
is no
one to buy. The difficulty with this is that it is true the shops
(especially the tourist places) are virtually empty, and the
economy
here, while probably not as bad as in other parts of Palestine,
is
devastated. Every small sale is a major transaction for these
shopkeepers. And this presents you with a real dilemma: on the
one
hand, it is clear that you are in the process of being taken
to the
proverbial cleaners, and this man will relieve you of every shekel
he
possibly can. On the other hand, the economy is terrible, and,
if
you are the kind of visitor that makes up much of the current
traveling population (you're probably here precisely because
you want
to support some part of the Israeli/Palestinian community) it
absolutely kills you to haggle about a couple of American dollars.
Never-the-less, the right side of your brain says "don't
be a fool.
He's cheating you, you know it, he knows it, and he will have
only
disdain for you if you quit now. Show a little gumption. You
know
it's expected." So you tell him that, for the person you're
buying
this for, maybe you would pay 15 or 20 shekels (BIG mistake the
range, which you think will leave you in the !7 and a half range,
has
now shot you over 20. "OK, I make nothing, but," and
by this point
he has taken a thin, black plastic bag down, put the camel in
it, and
is trying to force it into your hand, "but I take 27 and
that's
it." "No," you cry, "I didn't want to spend
more than 10. I'll give
you 22, and that's it." He will now sigh as if you personally,
and
heartlessly, are reaching into the mouths of his eight children
and
scooping out the food and eating it yourself. "You take
away
anything I can make but you are the first person in the shop
in
three days. Give me 25 and we will be friends." At this
point you
know, deep down inside, that you should have talked him down
to 15,
your next bid should be 23, but you cannot possibly go on for
the
sake of 50 cents or so, and, almost by an involuntary neural
response, you nod and it is done! You take the bagged camel,
give
the man his 25 shekels, and, as you begin to turn, he asks, "There
is
something else you need? Please, I show you a nice olive-wood
donkey." You thank him wearily, and walk out feeling relieved,
but
somehow, and unexplainably un-elated. This feeling lingers with
you
until, somewhere in the new city, you look into a souvenir store
window and see your camel, without that annoying nick on the
right
front leg, for 6 shekels.
*Every shopkeeper promises you
50% off everything. I find this
particularly fascinating since nothing is priced and all bargaining
begins with the common assumption that the seller will begin
with an
offer that is somewhere a few hundred percent more than the item
is
worth.
**Chazerei a Yiddish word, derived
from the Hebrew word for pig,
meaning junky stuff, particularly of the tacky persuasion. All
that
stuff your grandmother had spread out on the coffee tables, mantel,
and window sills was chazerei.
The Old City Jaffa Gate
Jaffa Gate, so named because the street that emanates from it
(Jaffa
Road) was the way to Jaffa, long before there was a Tel Aviv
attached
to it. Approaching Jaffa Gate is very different than approaching
Damascus gate. Here, on the western side of the walls of the
Old
City, modern sensibilities, technologies, and architecture have
impressed their sensitivities on the ancient walls. The gate
itself,
and the walls around it, are unchanged, but the municipality
has
redone the plaza in front of it, with open space, a sunken road,
new,
sophisticated signage directing your attention to the gate and
to the
Citadel (or Tower) of David behind it. This is the quintessential
tourist gate. As you enter the inner plaza you are greeted by
the
sight of the official Old City Visitors' Center, and a number
of
shops which, among other things, exchange money and sell Kodak
film
at outrageous prices. You are also greeted immediately and
assertively by suavely dressed men offering help, directions,
tours, taxis, free maps of the Old City, and visits to their
nearby
shops. It takes a great deal of will power, not to mention self-
assurance, to keep walking without responding in some way. I
usually
thank them politely and keep on my way, but even this is sometimes
perceived as a valid opening to initiate a profound long-term
relationship, and have, on occasion, been followed for some distance
into the casbah by these helpful guardians of the gate.
Jaffa Gate leads one into the Armenian Quarter which is, in fact,
inhabited primarily by Armenians. This is significant for two
reasons: 1) the Armenians are adamant about being Armenian, not
Arab, and 2) they are very much aware that they are the keepers
of
the gate of Jewish tourism. (The other day I entered the city
through Jaffa Gate and walked into the casbah and stopped at
a shop
where something caught my eye. Either because I have been traveling
in Palestine, or because I had been, up until then, mostly in
the
Arab parts of the Old City, I spontaneously greeted the young
shopkeeper with "Salaam Aleikem." He responded warmly
but
pointedly with a "Shalom.") While I have never heard
an Armenian
speak poorly of Arabs or Palestinians, they are duly proud of
their
heritage, and their long history in Jerusalem. At the same time,
they are clearly aware of the physical and symbolic position
the
quarter holds. Local Chasidim and others may access the Western
Wall
through the Damascus or other gates, but the only direct, clean,
and
(perceived) safe route from West Jerusalem (where the vast majority
of Jewish tourists stay) to the Western Wall is through Jaffa
Gate
and along the edge of the Armenian Quarter.
Although the Armenians are Christian,
since their shops cater less to
local residents than to tourists, the overwhelming amount of
their
goods are clearly geared to that market. In the shops one encounters
on entering into the inner passages, one finds virtually every
kind
of Jewish ritual and decorative object: menorahs, Sabbath candle
holders, spice boxes, kippot (yarlmukes), beautiful ceramic tiles
that say shalom in Hebrew, English, and southern ("Shalom
Y'all"),
etc., etc., etc. The styles are somewhat more traditional and
less
sophisticated than those found in shops in West Jerusalem, or
in the
Cardo in the Jewish Quarter (see below), but they can be quite
beautiful and well-crafted.
I was personally interested in
a number of small photography shops
that sell historical photos (mostly of Jerusalem). I almost
literally stumbled into one after taking what I first thought
was a
wrong turn, but turned out to be exactly where I should have
been.
The owner of the shop's father had been orphaned during the Armenian
genocide and, in the orphanage, was mentored by one of his teachers
who was a photographer. He eventually became an accomplished
photographer who chronicled the history of the Jerusalem of the
early
to mid 20th century, His son (the owner) has collected his father's
work in a magnificent book as noteworthy for its historical value
as
its artistic presentation. The owner now does mostly portrait
photography, but his son, the third generation, is now in the
process
of photographing all the places his grandfather shot decades
ago.
These photos will eventually be compiled in a follow-up volume.
As is the case throughout the Old City, the demarcations of the
various "quarters" exist somewhat more symbolically
than in reality.
Without a map it is difficult for me to identify where one ends
and
another begins, as they blend into one another depending on where
you
are. What is clear in this particular part of the city is the
fierce
loyalty that the Armenians have to their heritage and to their
place
in the history of this place.
The Old City The Jewish Quarter
While the Jewish Quarter can be accessed through the Zion, Tanners,
and Dung Gates as it is by the local residents, public
transportation, and the mostly orthodox visitors who would rather
not
walk through other parts of the Old City I "discovered"
this area
by walking through the Muslim and Christian Quarters. Approaching
from this direction and arriving suddenly and unexpectedly in
the
neighborhood is much like it must be to trudge through a deep
jungle
and suddenly come upon a great clearing with an uncharted city
gleaming in the sunlight. This city within a city within a city
is a
beautiful, if jarring district that defies all expectations.
Reclaimed and renovated ancient buildings blend seamlessly with
modern but complementary architecture to create a blend of tiny
residential alleys, broad open space, and commercial activity.
The history of the Quarter is rich, complicated, and disturbing
a
reflection of the reality that is modern Israel. When the Old
City
was captured by Jordan in 1948/49 the Jordanians did what they
could
to eradicate the Jewish presence that had existed there for
generations For almost 20 years Jews had no access to the Old
City,
or to the Western Wall. I remember well the accounts of
Israel's "liberation" of the Old City, with reports
of the high
number of casualties the Israelis suffered because the soldiers
had
been ordered not to fire into holy places where enemy soldiers
were
hiding. And I remember the first photos of Chief Rabbi Goren,
in
uniform, surrounded by the first soldiers to reach the Wall,
praying
together, the first Jews to do so in two decades. Jews everywhere
were elated, and proud of what "we" had done, and how
we had done it.
I do not disavow those feelings, nor am I sorry that Jews regained
access to our holy sites in the Old City. And nothing I say here
suggests that Jews should not have a presence here along with
all the
others whose ties to Jerusalem go back generations. My discomfort
with what I found in this new community comes from a feeling
that we
(Jews) have reclaimed and rebuilt the area, but while we now
have a
presence in the Old City, we are not fully of it.
That day I walked from Damascus
gate with the ultimate goal of
finding a particular restaurant in the Jewish Quarter that I
had been
told had excellent food and a wonderful view of the Temple Mount.
Maps of the Old City have only limited value since many of the
smaller streets and alleys are not noted, and one turn can send
you
off wandering for hours. I had some errands to do on the way,
and
stayed on the main through-streets, heading in the general direction
of the quarter. I took a jagged turn that I thought would take
me
toward Rehov Ha-Yehudim the Street of the Jews and passed between
two typical Arab souvenir shops (whose owners practically accosted
me
to get me to see their wares) and suddenly the street was free
of any
shops. As I walked on a few meters, on my right I saw a few wide
steps leading down into a an open area with brightly lit shops.
This, I was to find out, is the Cardo.
The Cardo is what remains of
Jerusalem's main thoroughfare in the
time of the Romans and Byzantines. Substantial parts of the original
road have been uncovered and visitors can climb down to view
excavated sections of the Hasmonean city walls and remains of
buildings from the First Temp period. What is absolutely amazing,
however, is that, along with these ruins is a long, covered,
mostly
underground upscale mall that makes the whole thing look something
like an archeological site if it had been designed by the people
who
did Quincy Market. Here one finds some of the best and priciest
shops exhibiting fine art (one store showcases exclusively the
art of
the famous Israeli artist Agam), crafts, Judaica, clothing, and
more. It is difficult to describe the feeling of walking out
of the
oriental casbah above, into this bright, modern, Western, Jewish
Copley Place in the middle of the Old City.
Leaving the Cardo I continued
on into the heart of the Jewish
Quarter. Here all vestiges of what existed in the past is gone,
except for the shells of some of the buildings. I cannot speak
to
the motivations or intentions of those who rehabilitated the
quarter,
but as you enter you feel as if you have crossed a distinct barrier
in time and space. This is no longer the Old City that is an
extension of the orient several centuries ago, but a carefully
planned 20th/21st century community built in a creative middle-
eastern style. The new structures have been designed to blend
with
and connect the old buildings that still exist, and large areas
have
simply been cleared to create beautiful squares and open space.
There are holy places and archeological sites that have been
incorporated into the overlook scheme. There are three or four
restaurants, a number of book stores, including one enormous
book/Judaica store that remains open well into the evening, and
a
small commercial area with at least two pizza places that I saw,
a
couple of small groceries (kind of middle eastern convenience
stores)
and, at the edge of the quarter, near the city walls, a larger
grocery with a wide variety of food and household staples as
well as
Hebrew and English periodicals.
The make-up of the community
seems to be overwhelmingly, if not
completely orthodox, mostly modern orthodox, although there were
a
significant number of Chasidim. Clearly there is a connection
between the type of religious Jews who live here and the
neighborhood's proximity to the Western Wall. There are a number
of
Yeshivot (Jewish schools, mostly for higher Torah education),
in
beautiful buildings built, in part, with contributions from wealthy
Westerners whose names appear everywhere you look. And this is
one
of the ironic aspects of the Jewish Quarter: a seeming majority
of
the people who actually live here are American Jews! I heard
distinctly more English than Hebrew, with small children often
conversing with parents in one language (usually English) and
with
strangers in the other. From what I saw, a significant part of
the
modern orthodox part of the community is made up of relatively
young
families with lots of young children.
I did eventually find the restaurant
I was looking for, aptly
named "The Quarter." Sitting up above a large courtyard,
near a
large Torah academy, it is, as we would say in New York, very
tony.
Despite being self service, it is a sophisticated bistro kind
of
place, with long tables inside, and an enclosed patio with (as
advertised) an incredible view across the nearby roofs of the
Dome of
the Rock, Al Aksa, and part of the Western Wall. I sat at one
of the
small patio tables along the window and, as the sun set, watched
the
changing colors of the large mosque glow across the city. (I
found
out only after I ate and the sun had set that there was yet
another level upstairs with an even more spectacular view. Maybe
I
and my camera will get back there.) And there, in the most Jewish
of
Jewish sections of Jerusalem I dined on a wonderful, homemade
rustic
vegetable soup, a piece of lightly breaded, sautéed halibut
with
parsley, and a three-cheese and spinach blintz. Not exactly my
Jewish mother's food! Jerusalem is nothing if not a place of
constant contradictions.
After dinner I strolled through
some of the immaculate, narrow
streets, working my way to the wall side of the quarter. As I
got
close to the outer wall I noticed a number of signs welcoming
people
to the Jewish Quarter, cautioning people to be respectful and
modest,
and indicating the donors of various buildings, paths, and sites.
I
find it interesting that I do not remember similar signs as I
entered
from inside the city an indication that the community does not
either expect visitors from there, nor do they anticipate any
particular interaction between themselves and the inhabitants
of the
other quarters. I walked through the two good-sized (huge by
Israeli
standards) parking lots one for residents, another for visitors
and found my way to the bus stop, where I got a bus into the
heart of
West Jerusalem.
9) Monday, Jan. 20, 2003 - Faisel
Hostel, Jerusalem
10:30 p.m.
By Martin R. Federman
A variety of reasons for not
writing for a few days. For one, I've
had a weird concurrence of computer-internet problems, including
the
fact that Earthlink decided to change its web-mail system while
I'm
here (I'm trying not to take it personally). It's actually quite
a
bit better, but there were thinks I had to do which weren't easy
on
internet-café kinds of machines. This was exacerbated
by the fact
that the internet at the hostel, usually pretty good, kind of
crashed
and, for a couple of days, all I could get to were horribly old
computers. Just another aspect of life on the road (how did Charles
Kuralt od it all those years, even if he wasn't in a war zone!)
I arrived in Jerusalem on Friday, just in time for Shabbat. Thanks
to the fact that I traveled from Tulkarem with Patrick Conners,
one
of the ISM coordinators, who was leaving the next day and had
to get
to Jerusalem very quickly in order to do some business, we took
an "easy" route. That involved only walking a bit to
get a taxi in
Tulkarem, another longer walk at the border crossing into Israel
(some hassle, but you get used to it which is part of the scary
part of what life is like here) and, once we were on the Israeli
side
of the green line, we took a "special" taxi (that's
a regular taxi
that only takes you, not waiting to fill up with other passengers
going to a general area which is called a sherut or "service"
taxi).
This only involves a much larger fare, but Patrick had already
arranged it in order to avoid taking a service taxi to the bus
station in Tel Aviv and then a long bus ride to Jerusalem. I
was
more than happy to share the fare, and in an hour and a half
or so
later we were in Jerusalem.
[A little postscript: As I got
into the hostel I realized that my
phone had fallen off, almost certainly in the taxi, which was
on its
way back to somewhere on the Israeli side of the green line near
Tulkarem. Being the wonderfully calm, centered, and self-actualized
person that you all know me to be, I immediately panicked, trying
simultaneously to think about what I would have to do to cancel
the
number, get a new number (having told you and everyone I am trying
to
contact here the old one), and how I would retrieve the numbers
that
I have programmed into the phone but not my hard-copy phone book.
Thank heavens for Hasoon, the wonderful man who takes care of
the
hostel, who calmly suggested that he call me, or rather my phone,
and
see who had it. I had, indeed, dropped it in the taxi, and in
a few
minutes the driver returned with the phone!]
Since I've been here I've taken
some time to decompress by roaming
various parts of the city as I've begun to meet with some of
the
people I wanted to see. I won't write much about that I'll report
at the appropriate times and places when I get back. I'd like
to use
this entry for some somewhat random thoughts some about my
meanderings, and some just thoughts I've had over the time I've
been
here. So, in no particular order:
Hebron, again: I don't know how
much you've gotten over there about
the shooting on Friday night of a settler and its aftermath.
The
short story is that, during Shabbat dinner on Friday, Netanel
Ozeri,
a leader of the outlawed Kach movement (founded by the late Meir
Kanhane), answered a knock at his door and was shot by a flash
of
gunfire from two Palestinian terrorists. He was killed instantly
and
one of his children and one of his Shabbat guests were wounded.
One
of the gunman was killed immediately, the other escaped, but
was
tracked down early Saturday morning and, because he was wearing
an
ammunition belt which the soldiers thought might have a bomb,
was
also killed. This, as all the violence against civilians, was
a
tragedy. But, as the story played out over the weekend, all the
worst ugliness of this situation, especially the real and symbolic
place Hebron has in all of this emerged. I can only begin to
communicate anything. I will try to attach an article that appeared
in today's Ha'aretz, if the computer allows me to. I'm pretty
sure
that it would still be on the Ha'aretz web sit
(www.haaretzdaily.com).
The two most pertinent articles
(there have been many) are "Slain
settler's body shuffled from Hebron to J'lem for hours, as burial
site is disputed" and "Palestinian homes, cars vandalized
by funeral
mob," in the Ha'aretz of Monday, January 20, 2003.
The gist is that Ozeri, as I
said, is a leader (and hero) of the far,
far, right religious ideological settlers. Among other things
he has
written "Baruch Hagever" (a play on words meaning either
"blessed is
the hero" or, in this case "Baruch the hero")
a book of poems and
essays lauding Baruch Goldstein, the ideologue doctor who sprayed
the
mosque at the Tomb of the Patriarchs with gunfire, killing dozens,
wounding lots more, on Purim some years ago. You may have also
heard
of Ozeri's father-in-law, Shaul Nir, who was in the spotlight
for a
while when he killed a Palestinian and was sentenced (by the
Israeli
courts) to a life sentence only to be pardoned by the president
of
Israel after serving seven years. Ozeri, mean while, was living
in
one of the so-called "satellite settlements," which
in this case
consisted of "Hill #26, with two makeshift buildings the
Ozeris
built, and one old Palestinian building they had taken over.
This is
one of the places that has been declared illegal even by the
Israelis
and the family was slated to be removed. In any event, starting
on
Saturday evening there were at least two organized attacks on
the
Palestinian part of Hebron, with people beaten, homes destroyed,
cars
and property set on fire. It appears that in some cases the Israeli
army intervened and in some they reportedly stood by and watched.
That part is unclear. What is clear is that some bizarre things
went
on with Ozeri's body. Apparently his wife and others wanted to
bury
him on Hill #26, which the army refused to let them do, others
wanted
him buried in the old cemetery in Hebron, and his parents wanted
him
buried near them in Jerusalem (so they could visit his grave).
Throughout Sunday the body, wrapped
in his prayer shawl, was
literally dragged from place to place, sometimes openly, sometimes
surreptitiously, sometimes in a vehicle, other times not. There
were
various eulogies at each location, negotiations between family,
rabbis, local leaders including calls to some of the top rabbinic
leaders of the right wing. You have to read the accounts to really
get a flavor of this horrendous mixture of hatred, violence,
revenge,
and disrespect of the dead. It's most interesting to me that,
in
their virulent hatred, these people who profess to be the keepers
of "true Torah Judaism" managed to break any number
of mitzvot
(commandments) regarding proper respect and handling of a dead
body,
including the way in which the body was moved, uncovering it
to show
to the mob, and delaying burial.
The Elections - A number of people
have asked me about my take on
the Israeli elections which take place in just over a week. I'm
no
political analyst and I'm not sure how much you folks are getting
in the media there, but this is one of the strangest campaigns
I've
ever seen. The polls all along have shown Sharon's Likud party
in
the lead, but that means, at it's strongest, about 35 "mandates"
(this is a proportional parliamentary system in which each party
offers a "list" of up to 120 people), barely a fourth
of the 120
seats in the Knesset. With the scandals (Likud was caught buying
votes and manipulating places on its list, and Sharon and his
two
sons have been accused of some seriously shady money stuff),
Likud
dropped a number of places, but that support did not go to Amram
Mitzna's Labor party, the main opposition, which has remained
in the
mid 20's the whole time, fluctuating a few mandates now and then.
What is amazing is the how much there is in the press about how
Labor
has accepted its defeat and Mitzna is mostly jockeying for post-
election support in order to fight off an expected challenge
to his
leadership of the party. What's clear is, regardless of his views
and proposals, Mitzna turned out to be a very unexciting campaigner
and candidate. At the same time Meretz, a more left party with
a
number of ex-Labor people at the top of its list, remains somewhere
in the teens.
Meanwhile there are three (really
a thousand, but I'll only write
about three) interesting pieces to this particular election:
1. Shinnui There is a new party
whose central platform is
support of doing away with the religious stronghold on the government
and country. This speaks strongly to a great many of the secular
majority (and even some religious people who do not support the
official status and perks of the orthodox institutions, or their
coercive nature). It's a mixed bag because the idea is one that
I,
for one, support, but Tommy Lapid, the leader of the party, raises
a
lot of populist kind of issues that have class and anti-religious
overtones. Be that as it may, it appears that a reasonable number
of
disaffected voters who traditionally back both Likud and Labor
are
turning to Shinnui. It would appear that they may will be the
third
largest block in the next Knesset. Which brings us to the issue
of
a . . .
2. National Unity Government
Some time ago Shinnui had already
announced that it would refuse to join a unity government that
included the religious parties. In the last couple of days Mitzna,
with far from universal support from his own party, announced
that
Labor will not be part of any government led by Likud. This has
raised all sorts of possible scenarios since even with a slight
bump
in the polls in the last couple of days (the scandals must have
peaked too soon), if Likud is able to form a coalition it will
have
to be with its traditional religious partners, and will almost
certainly be a razor-thin majority which leaves Sharon in much
the
same place he was when Labor pulled out causing the current elections.
The Federman prognosis? Likud will form the next government,
and
nothing else can be predicted!
3. The Economy And, perhaps the
most amazing thing in these
elections is the almost total absence of any talk about the economy.
This is remarkable because, basically the economy is dying. People
all over are losing jobs, there are virtually no tourists (Israel's
biggest source of income) so the hotels are empty (and closing),
and
that whole sector is dormant, and billions of shekels that are
going
into supporting the settlements, the occupation, and the military
they require, are not going into social welfare (things like
health
benefits are being cut) or infrastructure. Folks at the bottom
of
the society are fed-up with this situation, which is affecting
the
support for closing the settlements and ending the occupation,
but
cannot overcome the general (understandable) Israeli perception
of
siege which permits "security" to overwhelm everything
else.
Consequently, except for very
targeted campaigning in specific
neighborhoods (especially by smaller, limited issue parties)
you hear
nothing about the economy outside of the financial pages. I did
read
in today's paper (can't remember if the Jerusalem Post or Ha'aretz)
that Mitzna met over the weekend with the leadership of his economic
section and said he wants that to be the thrust of his media
campaign
in the last week. One of the top people in that group was quoted
as
saying that this was the proper decision, but far too late. The
extent of this non-issue was reflected in a two page spread in
one of
the papers entitled "It's Not the Economy Stupid."
RANDOM THOUGHTS
Pedestrian Crossings The Israelis
(as my friend Lee used to
say) "are not a subtle people!" If generalizations
can be made (and
of course they shouldn't be), they tend to be aggressive, pushy,
and
loud. That is why I am totally astounded that they, almost to
a
person, always wait for the light to turn green, or the "Walk"
sign
to go on before crossing the street!
Taxi Drivers If there is anything
to the genetic tie between our
peoples, an unfortunate expression of this is the areas taxi
drivers. While it shows itself in slightly different ways, one
of
the few things you can count on here (in Israel and Palestine)
is if
a driver can cheat you, he will. Palestinian drivers tend to
be a
bit more discounting making you feel that this is just the way
it
is and what you have to expect or else they bargain with you
in a
way you can't possibly win (see below). Israeli drivers, who
are
supposed to use the meter if you ask them, will find all sorts
of
ways to get an extra shekel or two. Despite the incredibly high
level of technological expertise, they seem unable to keep their
taxi
meters working I don't know how many taxis I've been in with
broken
meters (this applies, by the way, to all Israeli taxis driven
by
Palestinian and Jewish Israelis). Other meter rationales include
the
time of day and where you are going ("Damascus Gate?!?!
I don't go
there its too dangerous. 30 Shekels, I'll go near.".) And,
of
course, in a place legendary for the linguistic abilities of
its
population, no taxi driver speaks English and, amazingly, taxi
drivers, regardless of whether they are Jewish, Palestinian,
Israeli,
only speak Arabic if you speak any Hebrew, and only Hebrew if
you
happen to have a few words of Arabic! I have decided that, before
my
next trip here, I'm going to learn something like Rumanian, or
perhaps Proto-Semetic, in order to have a common language with
taxi
drivers.
Smoking If there was an Olympic
smoking event, I would have to put
my money on the Palestinians taking the gold, but a respectable
silver would go to the Israelis. I know people smoke all over
the
world, but, I've never experienced anything like I have here.
The
other night I was in a Russian pub with a sign that said "Smoking
Section." Given the fact that no specific area was designated,
I
took the sign to be referring to the entire area of historical
Palestine.
The Hamburger Wars When I was
here 35 years ago there was only one
place to get a hamburger in Jerusalem, Wimpy's (pronounced, in
the
absence of a "w" sound in Hebrew, "Vimpy's). Now
there are any
number of homegrown and imported hamburger places, led by the
best
America has to offer: Burger King and MacDonalds. You may be
aware
of the stirrings of a boycott against Burger King, since the
Whopper
has found its way to the mini-shopping centers in some of the
settlements. This however, is not the real news. The serious
story
has to do with MacDonalds which, apparently, wanted to open both
kosher and non-kosher outlets, but was not given certification)
by
the all-powerful orthodox establish-ment, so it is not clear
to me
whether any MacDonalds are kosher. I do know that in the middle
of
town, near Zion Square, only 50 meters or so from an absolutely,
unassailably kosher Burger King, there is a MacDonalds where,
although they use only kosher meat, you die-hards can get a real
shake with your good old-fashioned cheeseburger! A Footnote:
As
I've wandered (East and West) I have seen Pizza Hut, Sbarros,
Dominos
Pizza, and a number of Ben & Jerry's. To Jerusalem's credit,
I have
not yet seen a Starbucks or a Dunkin' Donuts but I haven't really
been to Tel Aviv yet.
Red light, green light, or please
sir, may I cross? A couple of
people have asked about the differences between border crossings,
checkpoints, and roadblocks. I can't fully answer that because
a)
it's complicated and would take too long; b) there is a certain
amount of overlap; and c) I'm not really sure I have a clue!
But,
basically here's the difference:
Border Crossings places where
one goes across the green
line (the pre-1967 borders that arose from the armistice after
1948),
or between Israel and Gaza. This is like traveling from one country
to another and local people are subject to show their identity
papers
(sort of like showing an I.D. if asked while crossing between
the
U.S. & Canada). Foreigners need to show appropriate passports
and
visas. Of course the reality is that, while usually fairly easy
for
us foreigners and for the average Israeli Jew there are layers
of
often arbitrary interrogations, delays, and humiliations for
Israeli
Arabs and Palestinians from either side of the green line.
Checkpoints I have yet to find
any consistency to where
checkpoints are set up, and sometimes they just appear and then
disappear, but they are basically places that the Israelis have
determined need to be policed to minimize the possibility of
terrorists entering. On a street leading from East to West Jerusalem
the other day, where I had already passed a couple of times,
there
was suddenly a checkpoint. We went through rather quickly in
this
case (in a taxi with a Palestinian-Israeli driver), but it was
strange. Here again, what the soldiers can ask or require is
virtually limitless, and they have total discretion over whether
one
can pass or not.
Roadblocks places where the Israelis
have simply created
some impediment to vehicular traffic. They can be large mounds
of
dirt, often many meters high, or deep trenches, or combinations
thereof. Frequently they appear in pairs, hundreds of meters
apart,
forming a small no-man' land that travelers must walk across
to get
from one place to another. Most often (in my experience) there
are
no soldiers attached to these roadblocks. Most that I have seen
have
been at the perimeter of towns, blocking off vehicular travel
in or
out, although I have seen roadblocks within towns. Since they
are
usually not guarded, and foot traffic, although sometimes difficult,
is not completely impeded, they seem to serve only one set of
purposes: to disrupt normal life in and around Palestinian cities,
towns and villages, and to make travel and commerce, even between
nearby communities, nearly impossible. In some ways the roadblocks
are the most insidious since they seem somewhat benign and have
the
ability to disrupt life so profoundly. I think that's why there
was
such elation among the people in Nablus when we broke through
the two
roadblocks obstructing passage on a main road there.
8) Thursday, Jan. 16, 2003 -
ISM Apartment, Tulkarem
7:30 p.m.
by Martin R. Federman
I'm tempted to begin with an
offhand remark like "just a typical day
in Palestine," but even black humor becomes more difficult
as the
days pass. As many of you have probably already heard, two boys
(various sources have reported that both were either 16 or 17)
were
killed here in Tulkarem. The facts about one are disputed, the
Israeli military saying that he was throwing stones and molotov
cocktails, the local people saying not. The other case seems
clearer: as they do periodically, the military came into town
to
enforce a curfew that had just been declared and rolled into
the
neighborhood where most of the boys' schools are. Some of the
students probably threw some stones, and the soldiers responded
with
rubber-coated steel bullets, tear gas, and live ammunition and
one
boy was killed. Just by chance we were at an elementary school
in a
nearby village this afternoon (more about that in a moment) and
were
invited in by the woman who heads it. It turns out that she is
the
aunt of the boy that was killed. She told us that he had never
been
in trouble (what aunt wouldn't say that?), but I thought her
description of his death was poignant: "He was just on his
way
school," she said, "and his backpack was still on his
back."
A depressing footnote to this
already tragic story: by early this
morning their were already posters throughout Tulkarem with this
new "martyr's" picture. What made this even more striking
is that he
is pictured wielding two machine guns clearly not the image of
the
boy we heard about. As far as we can tell, there are some
stock "martyr" pictures onto which these children's
images are
superimposed, using them just one more time in death.
Since the schools are near where
the army installation is, and when
they come in to Tulkarem in the morning they come by the students,
six of us decided to walk across town and observe in case anything
happened. Thank goodness nothing did, and we just interacted
a bit
with the boys, stayed around for a while after school began,
and
headed back. Patrick, one of the coordinators in Tulkarem, is
leaving tomorrow after being here for a long time, so he has
been
saying goodbye to the friends he's made around the city.
We stopped in a number of places, had some tea and coffee, and
eventually heard the news that a house in Qataba, a village
overlooking Tulkarem, had been appropriated by the Israeli military.
It was not clear whether the family that lived there had been
evacuated or not, or why the military was there, so we decided
to see
if we could be some help in negotiating the situation. We took
a
taxi up to the village and found the head of the village council,
talking to neighbors as we went. It turns out that the military
has
expropriated this particular house twice before, and another
near
once, because they provide ideal visibility over both Tulkarem
and
the refugee camp near it. Apparently these houses have been used
to
watch activities below and, on a couple of occasions, snipe from
them. We were able to determine that there was a couple in the
house
with five of their seven children (two older sons were not there),
the telephones had either been cut or they did not have access
to
them, and no one had spoken to them since the Israelis arrived,
around 3:00 in the morning. (It was during this walk that we
were
invited by the head of the council to go into the school for
a few
minutes while an attempt was made to see of the sons of the owners
of
the occupied house were in the town.)
We decided that we would approach
the house and see if we could
convince the soldiers to let us speak to the family, ascertain
that
they were OK, find out if they wanted to stay or leave, and possibly
bring them some food and supplies. Just before we were ready
to go
we were told that the soldiers had left, which seemed rather
strange. We decided to go anyway and see if the family was OK.
When
we got near the house we could see members of the family in the
windows on the second of three floors. We tried to call out to
them,
but we then heard loud voices (soldiers in the house) and they
quickly withdrew into the house. We agreed that three of us would
approach and try to talk to the soldiers, while the other three
would
hang back and observe (I was with that group). The "negotiators,"
including Patrick, who speaks Arabic, tried to convince the soldiers
to let us come down and speak to the family and make sure they
were
alright and didn't need anything. They were, to say the least,
unresponsive, shouting for us to leave. As we spoke a tank, an
APC,
and a military truck appeared from the far side of the house,
coming
from some concealed place down a winding road. They moved into
the
area with the clear intent of intimidating us (with a reasonable
amount of success), the tank driving directly at the trio near
the
house, the APC coming farther up the hill towards us. Some of
the
soldiers got out of the tank and spoke to us, finally telling
us that
if we went up the hill, stayed beyond where they told us, they
would
bring the family up to speak to us in an hour. While we knew
that
they would not honor this "deal," we had little choice
at that point,
and wanted to leverage our credibility. We went to a nearby house
where we spoke to a number of the neighbors, trying to get as
much
background information as possible.
Another side-situation presented
itself at that point. One of the
men in the house we were at raises chickens, who, for the most
part,
were in a building underneath the backside of their house, facing
the
side of the occupied house. He had tried to go down to feed the
chickens but the soldiers had threatened him and chased him away,
and
he was terrified to try again. He asked us if we would go down
with
him. When the hour was up and, as expected, the soldiers made
no
attempt to communicate with us, we walked back to the house,
which
again had no army vehicles around it. Our "forward team"
asked to be
allowed to speak to the family and let the neighbor go feed his
chickens. It was immediately clear that they had no intention
of
letting us do anything when curtains upstairs were opened and
automatic weapons were pointed at us. We were told in no uncertain
words to leave immediately or be shot at. We held our ground,
demanding to see the family, and I could hear one of the Israelis
say
that he couldn't speak to us because he didn't understand English.
While this was clearly lie (he and others had spoken to us in
halting
but functional English earlier), I went down part of the way
and
called Patrick. We decided that it was worth our bridging this
challenge by my speaking to them in Hebrew. I approached the
building and began speaking, when the front door opened and the
family came out and began loading their two cars with clothes
and
household items, obviously getting ready to leave. When we tried
to
call to them and see if they were alright and leaving by choice,
soldiers from inside shouted at them and told them not to talk
to
us. We waited an watched until the cars were loaded, the gate
was
opened, and the cars pulled out, one going down the hill, the
other
backing up towards us. The driver the father of the family got
out and talked to us. No, they didn't want to leave, but they
were
given a choice; during the first time the house had been occupied
the soldiers (its not clear how or why) had burned the upper
story;
the last time they were there, the soldiers had taken a number
of
personal items, including a sum of money equal to something between
$750 and a couple of thousand (the man was, understandably,
distraught and we couldn't tell and didn't push the point when
he
was talking about Jordanian dinars, when Israeli shekels, and
when
dollars). This time they were not permitted to take a number
of "personal items" that they wanted; yes, they had
a place to stay
in Tulkarem. Finally, we gave them the emergency number of an
organization that gives legal advice (probably of no value) and
support in situation like this, we exchanged phone numbers, and
he
got back in the car and drove off.
Which left the issue of the chickens.
So, at that point, I walked
with one other person down the hill and shouted out to the now
empty
windows, saying, in Hebrew, that my Hebrew wasn't great, but
I wanted
to talk to someone about letting this man go feed his chickens.
I
was told to just wait. Suddenly, from down the lower part of
the
road again, the tank and the APC re-appeared, heading directly
for
us. We (pretty much) held our ground, and, as two soldiers got
out
of the APC, I repeated my request and was told, quite unpleasantly,
to be quiet and wait. I said fine, and watched as they proceeded
to
unload LUNCH! from the APC. Finally, two of the soldiers, one
of
whom was obviously the "commander," approached me and
asked, again
quite impatiently and angrily, what I wanted. I explained that
the
man up the hill lived in the next house, had chickens in the
building
below it, and simply wanted two minutes to go in and feed them
that
he could leave enough food that they would be OK for a week,
but
without the food they would die. The soldiers were initially
unmoved, irritably wanting to know why I was getting involved
with
something that was none of my business. By this time they had
pointedly cocked their weapons and came right up to me. I have
no
problem admitting that I would have been very happy to turn and
run
up the hill, but my assumption was that they would go pretty
far to
intimidate me, but the weren't about to shoot an unarmed
international in front of a bunch of people up the hill. Again
they
asked what I wanted, and again I explained about the chickens
and
pointed to the door where they were. I pointed out that no one
would
have to go near them, and they could easily watch what was
happening. Finally, to my great relief, it appeared as if the
second
soldier (not the "commander") was softening just a
bit, so I partly
directed myself to him, asking what the difference was if this
guy
went and fed his chickens. The two whispered to one another,
and
with incredible disdain, the commander told me that the villager
had
five minutes to go feed the birds but, he could only get there
by
going up the hill, around his house, and approach from the other
side. This was amazing because it made no sense, would take longer,
and actually put the villager out of the soldiers' sight line
for a
considerable distance. We agreed later that this was nothing
more
than a typical occupier technique, imposing control and showing
who
owns the situation. That was perfectly alright with me. I then
thought that we might have pushed one step too far when I told
the
soldiers that the man was very frightened and asked that one
of us
accompany him. For a moment I thought that the "commander"
was going
to lose it he gave me a look that was full of hatred and emptied
of
all patience, as if to say "I wish I could just shoot you
and be done
with these stupid chickens," but, instead, he gave his exasperated
assent, and waved us away. While the villager and one of the
ISMers
went around to the chicken house, the soldiers made it absolutely
clear that they did not want to see us around that neighborhood
again, and, again pointing their weapons at me, next time things
would not go so easily! Once the chickens were fed (!) we headed
back to the village office, regrouped with the council head,
and
returned to Tulkarem.
We went to meet with some people
at PARC (Palestinian Agricultural
Reclamation Committee, I think). These people are really important
because they are part of a core coalition that is developing
a
strategy to protest the erection of the wall. There are some
significant suggestions for mass demonstrations in the coming
months. Truth, be told, however, I suffered an adrenaline drop
while
in their offices, and I thought I was going to fall asleep in
the
middle of a conversation I was participating in! When a couple
of
people decided to go to a checkpoint that had been closed and
see
what was going on, I opted to go to the internet place and send
the
two entries you just received and come back and rest.
A hopeful follow-up to the story
I shared a while back about Ras
Attiya, where the town's beautiful school was threatened by the
soldiers. After the soldiers left the teachers talked to the
kids
about what had happened. It should be obvious that the effect
of
these incidents especially when the kids see other kids their
age
being killed is devastating. In this case the teachers did a
fine
job redirecting the kids feelings, and they decided to get some
paint
and make signs to put outside the school. Some of the slogans
the
kids came up with:
Stop Killing Children
Let me learn peacefully
Stop Confiscating Land
and my personal favorite:
Tanks + Weapons = No Learning
[It's 9:30 p.m. There were a
couple of shots fired a while ago, I
now hear crowds shouting and breaking bottles outside below our
windows.]
Some things we learned today
about the house that was blown up a few
nights ago: the family that lived in it was renting. What's the
point? The layers of unnecessary punishment here are endless.
The
army, under some un-articulated pretense decides to come in and
arrest someone. To make an example, despite the fact that there
have
been no charges filed, he is put under "administrative detention"
for
a minimum of six months, and the house that he lives in will
be
demolished. As a result, his family, who may or may not have
even
known about, much less participated in, whatever it was that
we're
not told this young man may or may not have done, is now without
a
place to live, and all of their material possessions have been
destroyed. At the same time, the army has destroyed the local
office
of the Minister of Agriculture which was upstairs, and, just
to add a
little spice, whoever owns the building, who almost certainly
has no
connection with the unknown deeds that the young man has not
been
charged with, that his family may or may not have known about,
woke
up one morning to find out that his building no longer exists.
Excuse my way of drawing this out it is really crucial that people
begin to see and react to the layers upon layers upon layers
of
the consequences of this collective punishment, punitive action.
It
just goes on and on, effecting everyone, devastating individuals'
lives, families, and communities all without any real justification.
7) Reports 1-14/15-03
Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2003
Martin R. Federman
- ISM Apartment, Tulkarem
10:00 p.m.
It is difficult to keep up with
things, what with the time it takes
to get around, how much s happening, the difficulty I've had
getting
to internet sources, and the fact that I haven't been carrying
the
lap-top with me.
A word about Ras Attyia, where
we began an action last week. There
has been an ongoing confrontation there, and in Habla, the small
village next to it. In Ras Attyia my group confronted the soldiers
again on the line where the wall is going. While at one point
there
seemed to be a reduction of tension, the soldiers began responding
in
a harsher and harsher way, finally demanding that our group leave.
When they were told no, they began shooting tear-gas canisters,
firing them into the crowd, rather than into the air as is standard
procedure. One older Palestinian man from the village was hit
directly, injuring him considerably, and a teenager who pushed
the
canister away was seriously burned.
One of Ras Attyia's most cherished
attractions is a large, new school
funded by the Swiss government, and capable of serving hundreds
of
children from the area. In a particularly vicious move, as the
soldiers pulled back from their attack, they announced over mobile
loudspeakers that the crowd needed to disperse, and if they returned,
the school would be demolished. Someone will have to explain
to me
the logic of that kind of policy. What, other than a cruel kind
of
collective punishment used to crush and control a whole population,
can the military be suggesting? And how can they not see the
level
of hatred they are sowing here? Or, heaven forbid, is that exactly
what they are trying to do? It is beyond me.
The resistance in Attyia goes
on, while the internationals have
simultaneously moved to Habla where an attempt is being made
to set
up a tent enclave on land that the Israeli military is taking
in
conjunction with the wall. As of this morning the tents had not
arrived, and things seem temporarily quiet.
One other story from Attyia:
Someone told me that the school need 36
textbooks which are coming from somewhere in the south but they
have no way of transporting that many books across the borders
and
checkpoints. As of when I was told this (a day or two ago) they
had
only been successful in transporting six books: by donkey!
Tuesday, January 14, 2003
Decided to go to Qualqilya to see the part of the wall that is
already constructed, and try to get back to Ras Attiya. As we
were
headed to the taxi lot, we heard that there had been a house
blown up
a few blocks from the ISM apartment. We walked over to see the
damage and try to find out what happened. In fairness I need
to say
that all the information I have at this point is from the people
in
the neighborhood. From talking to ISM coordinators, the sense
is
that, except for some possible exaggeration of numbers, and sometimes
some confusion distinguishing between soldiers, security personnel,
and police, the experience is that the locals are pretty accurate,
and are forthcoming about the backgrounds of people they talk
about.
I offer those observations only because we do not have independent
confirmation of all the facts regarding what has been going on
for
the last three days in Tulkarem. Having said that, I can pretty
much
attest to the major facts (which have been observed first-hand
by one
or more of us) and the probable accuracy of some of the peripheral
information.
Apparently around 2:00 a.m. Monday
morning a large number of soldiers
(some say as many as 100, with numerous jeeps, a tank and three
APC's
entered Tulkarem and headed to this house, which stood at the
end of
a block of typically connected Arabic homes. There were five
people
(a couple and their three children) living on the lower level
of the
house, with the offices of the local Ministry of Culture Office
upstairs. The inhabitants were ordered, by mobile loudspeaker,
to
evacuate the house immediately, without taking anything with
them (I
spoke, through interpreters, to the father of the house who said
that
he was not even given time to put on his shoes), they were moved
from
the house and it was blown up with dynamite. At least one care
that
we saw was crushed in the rubble of the house, windows in nearby
houses were blown out, but remarkably, given the total destruction
of
this building, there seemed to be minimal damage to the house
attached to the rear of the structure. Although a moderate-sized
earth mover had been working for some time at removing the major
rubble, remnants of the family's personal goods, furniture, and
appliances were easy to identify among the debris.
Once the house was demolished,
the family's 20 year old son was taken
into custody, without any specific charges. People we spoke to
were
adamant about his not being part of any terrorist groups or activity,
saying that he was your typical Palestinian young man, who worked
at
odd jobs when he could get them, trying to make some money for
the
family. Sometime after the demolition and arrest (after 3:00
a.m.)
the army moved out and, according to those who were there, shot
tear
gas behind them and announced that this "was a message for
all of you
in this city."
Again, I don't want to suggest
that there aren't things we haven't
learned yet. But most of the story seems confirmed, and one of
the
ISM coordinators says that in the past the locals have been very
forthcoming about who was and wasn't involved in unsavory
activities. My gut says that what we have been told is basically
the
story as far as we know it.
[Once again, as I am typing this
in the ISM apartment, I can hear
gunfire, happily this time at some distance.]
Once we left the site of the demolition I took off with Douad
for
Qualqilya.
[Douad is a, to say the least,
interesting character. He is an
English Muslim, from (the other) Cambridge, who left England
when he
was 13 to live in the Sudan. He has lived in a variety of Arab
countries, came to Palestine to be near Al Quds (Jerusalem) and
the
Dome of the Rock, somehow got to Jaiyus and stayed there. Originally
he was ISM's contact with Jaiyus, but they obviously had some
mutual
problems and now he acts as Jaiyus' contact with ISM. From what
I
was told when I was n Jaiyus, Douad is more Muslim than the Muslims
in the village, and they have taken him in, but perceive him
as the
village eccentric. My only discomfort with him came when we were
walking the long walk at the Jebara roadblock, and he casually
informed me that he is connected to the "socil/political
arm of
Hamas," spontaneously reassuring me that this had nothing
to do with
the military wing (the terrorists) but the part of Hamas that
supports and funds social services throughout the territories.
More
about this at another time, but I must admit that I wasn't totally
devastated when we parted!]
I was happy to have someone to
travel with, even though it would be
only part of the way. I haven't the energy to write about the
trip
in detail, and I'm sure many of you don't want to hear about
another
trip like that. Suffice it to say that it took four taxis, one
very
long walk and two shorter ones, at least one lengthy interrogation
by
soldiers, and a bit of shekels to go from Tulkarem to Jebara
to Azun
to Jaiyus to finally get to Qualqilya.
(As we passed through Jaiyus
Douad pointed out a huge garbage dump
which he says is on land that the Israeli's expropriated from
Jaiyus
and now charge the Palestinians to dump their garbage there!
He also
claims that there is low-grade radioactive waste underneath and
there
has been a significant rise in cancer and birth defects in the
area.
I have made a note to check this out when I speak to some of
the
medical people I'm going to see in the next week or so.)
Qualqilya is probably the nicest, quietest, and most modern of
the
cities I've seen in the Northern West Bank (e.g., Nablus, Jenin,
and
Tulkarem). The approach we came in on is actually attractive,
and
the downtown area, while not as large and open as Nablus, seems
more
vibrant and sophisticated. It also seems to be the least damaged
by
Israeli incursions, although the ever-present signs of tank travel
(broken curbs, damage to shops, etc.) are indisputably there.
There
is also a significant amount of Hebrew on the signage, attesting
to
the fact that Qualqilya's location right on the green line gives
it a
history of much interaction with Israeli's in the past. I have
no
real way of knowing if Qualqilya's economic situation is better
than
elsewhere for the time being,and therefore the relative quiet,
but it
seemed to me that might be the case.
Life in The Ghetto. The tragedy
of this city is that the wall is
going to come right across the green the line and form a circle
around the entire city (in some places right behind people's
houses), [There is more gunfire going off] The result will be
what
the people in Qualqilya regularly refer to as the shape of "a
bottle," with the neck being the one outlet: a single road
(which
will, of course be controlled by the Israelis) leading off to
the
west, into the West Bank. It means that, once again, there will
not
be access to the bulk of Qualqilya's farmland, and for all intents
and purposes (I cannot be adamant enough about how reluctantly
I use
this word) Qualqilya will become a giant ghetto, with the population
trapped within the walls, and the ability to move in and out
controlled by someone else.
The dissonances here are amazing
and sometimes surreal. When I
finally arrive at the Red Crescent offices in Qualqilya I am
told
that Roman (the Russian-American Jew from Medford) that I wanted
to
connect with here, has gone to Nablus and will return in an hour
or
so. I am brought to a small reception office where eight or nine
people, only one of whom wpeaks any English, are sitting, walking
around, drinking tea and (of course) smoking. I figure out that
this
is, in part, a dispatch room, with connections to the various
ambulances and people out in the field. Suddenly, from the window
behind me, I hear the slightly disembodied music that one expects
to
hear from a soft ice-cream truck in the USA. The music is loud,
draws my attention (but, apparently, no one else's), and it is
definitely "This Old Man" as in "This old man,
he plays one, he plays
knick-knack on his thumb, with a knick-knack paddy-whack, give
the
dog a bone, this old man, he plays one." Only later, when
I've heard
this maddening cacophony a number of times, do I find out that
it
comes from a wagon going through the streets announcing that
it has
canisters of home gas to sell.
Roman arrives and we walk next
door to a tiny emergency hospital.
They care for local emergencies and follow-up, with a small lab,
surgery capabilities, post-op, etc. They have a small pharmacy,
but
they cannot always give people medicine because they don't have
the
money.
We go back where Roman introduces
me to Dr. Salaeh Abu-Reehan, the
head of the Red Crescent Association in the Qualqilya district.
We
sit in his office for some time as he lectures on the needs of
the
Red Crescent and the evils of both Israel and the U.S. Some of
the "conversation:"
The Red Crescent need"disposables" for ambulances.
(As we
talk he takes out lists of things they need.)
He shows us the paperwork for a woman with a heart problem
who can't afford the medications she needs, and there is no one
to
donate them.
He talks about different organizations that have helped
obtain medicines and other supplies, and the agencies that help
facilitate getting them.
If the United States attacks Iraq Israel will close all the
cities in Palestine, so they have to have adequate stores of
medicines and supplies.
They have limited sources of donations, and they will not
take anything from some sources. (The mafia has tried to donate
money in order to use the Red Crescent for "cleaning the
money"
(money laundering!).
The Red Crescent cooperates with all other medical
operations, although they can't do planning or budgeting with
groups
like the Palestinian Medical Relief Committees, because they
are
political and the Red Crescent must remain a-political. I ask
what
kind of political connections the PMRC have, and he tells me
Communist. I have since confirmed that PMRC is, in fact loosely
connected to Communist parties, but that, of course means very
different things here than it does in the U.S.
[Midnight: A few spurts of rifle
fire, much closer to us.]
Later a table is set up in a waiting area and we have something
to
eat while the TV is on, mattresses are eventually laid out for
two of
the overnight ambulance drivers, one of whom goes through an
elaborate water pipe ritual involving burning chunks of apple
and
molasses flavored tobacco. When a friend from the U.S. calls
me a
while later I'm moved to look at what is going on: I am sitting
in
the offices of the Qualqilya district Red Crescent, in the West
Bank,
watching "Madonna: Innocence Lost!!!!!" on cable TV.
The dissonances
here are deafening.
Tuesday, January 14, 2003
In the morning I want to see the wall, but, instead we visit
Marwan ?, who coordinates the work of all the NGO's (Non-governmental
Organizations) in the Qualqilya district. Basically an association
of association and organizations. He shares more stories of the
difficulties facing the organizations trying to provide services
under occupation and in the virtual absence of the Palestinian
Authority (PA). He talks about the people dying and giving birth
at
the checkpoints his own son could not get to Jerusalem for an
MRI
and he, himself, has heart disease, should be using librator,
but
can't get it here. H particularly stresses the burden on education
and schooling. Curfews close the schools regularly (but, he points
out, during a 14-day school vacation there was no curfew. Marwan
is
an impressive man who seems to care deeply and is struggling
to
coordinate services in a Kafka-esque gulag.
Next we stop at a military hospital,
run by the PA. It has three
doctors (two general, one pediatrician) who service only military
and
police personnel and their families. This is a bizarre concept
because, since the Intifada and the re-imposition of occupation,
there are no identifiable military or police personnel. Roman
says
that we have heard in the U.S. that Arafat has put away millions
of
dollars for himself. If he has all this money, why don't the
hospitals have medicines. The director says that he does not
believe
that any man would keep that kind of money and let his people
suffer.
We move on to Al Quds Open University, where we meet with the
head of
the Qualqilya site. Al Quds was first opened in 1992 as a response
to the difficulty that university students had in getting to
traditional schools because of the travel problems and closings.
The
idea was to bring university education to students since it was
more
and more difficult to get the students to the university. The
school
in Qualqilya opened in 1999 with 100 students. Through "unplanned
expansion," there are now 1,020 students with 20 full time
and 40
part time faculty. They offer a variety of degrees in four major
areas: computers, management, social studies, and the largest
department, education. The director is very proud of the fact
that
they have students from all strata of Palestinian society, all
ages,
and probably more than half women. They strive to make this a
university that meets the needs of their students so, for instance,
whereas students in traditional schools have up to six years
to
complete a four-year bachelor's degree, at Al Quds there is a
maximum
of 12 (to allow especially for those who work or have other
obligations). There are now 18 branches in he system, with 30,000
students. We are told that the Israelis cannot stop these students
from getting an education, "they insist to study!"
His message
sounds authentic as we walk through the three floors of the
university: the energy is palpable.
This conversation, like most
in Palestine, turns to politics. "We
don't need to fight them [the Israelis]," the director tells
us, "We
just need our freedom. There is no choice we will not leave,
they
will not kill our will. We are not like our grandfathers, we
will
not be chased away again. We insist on surviving they can destroy
our homes, they can steal our land, they cannot kill our minds.
We
will survive because we have no choice." Finally he asks
us to
deliver "my message when you go back: We are people, we
are human
beings."
One of the students walks us
back to the Red Crescent where nothing
seems to be happening. As much as I want to see the wall, I am
becoming impatient with Abu Raheem I want to be using my time
to
the fullest. I call Radhika, who I believe to be in Ras Attiya,
but
it turns out that she is right here in Qualqilya, at the Glow
Internet Café. I take my things and walk to meet her and
Patrick,
who take me to the really nice ISM apartment. (Next time around
that's where I want to be, regardless of what is going on!) It
turns
out that Radhika and David (from New York) is going on to Jaiyus,
and
Patrick is headed back to Tulkarem before he leaves the country.
They tell me that it is almost impossible to get around most
of the
Qualqilya district, including Ras Attiya, and I decide to go
back to
Tulkarem with Patrick.
On our way out of Qualqilya we
stop at an old café for some tea. The
owner sits with us, telling us some of the history of the place,
which goes back to 1920. He lived in Chicago for seven years
in the
1980's, but he hated America ("They kill people for no reason
in
America," he tells us. "At least here we kill for a
purpose.") As
we talk, he shares that his 27 year old son was arrested (they
don't
know why, this was the first time he had any trouble) and is
now
under "administrative detention." This is an category
that exists
outside of the normal legal system (but is, amazingly, legal
according to international law) and allows the military to detain
someone for up to six months without having to file charges or
allow
any of the usual defendant's rights (like access to a lawyer).
At
the end of the six months the detention can be renewed simply
on the
order of a single officer, Major-General or above, and these
extensions have no limit! "We call him two or three times
a week and
ask how he is. He says he's OK, but we know he lies. How can
things
be OK in that prison. And if they are OK for him, they are not
OK
for his mother. Or his father." We have finished our tea
and he
tells us that he must go to pray the afternoon prayers. We gather
our things and ask how much for the tea. Nothing, he says. We
urge
him to take some money but he refuses, saying "the first
time is
free, so you will come back! We tell him it is not necessary,
but
know that he will not take our money. "Next time,"
he promises, "I
will charge you double!" I ask him if he would mind having
his
picture taken, that I am trying to take pictures of all the nice
people I meet here and he is a very nice person. He shrugs humbly
and answers "why not?" When we are in the taxi going
out of
Qualqilya Patrick acknowledges that he has found a situation
where
his (quite proficient) Arabic has failed him. "What's the
proper
response," he asks, "when someone's just told you their
son is in
prison, we don't know why, when he'll be out, or when we will
see him
again."
A Difficult Acknowledgement.
This is hard to write. I love
the Palestinian people, their
hospitality, their persistence. And I find great energy in the
work
that is being done here. But truth be told, I hate it here in
Palestine. It is far worse here than it was the last time I was
here. I hate the time that is eaten up and lost forever just
trying
to get from place to place. I hate the horrible roads that we
have
to travel. I hate the constant humiliation of the checkpoints,
and
watching the faces of the people who wait while I go through.
I hate
the tanks, and the jeeps, and the APC's. I hate the fact that
every
aspect of Palestinian life is framed by the ability to move about,
and the confines of the places left to them. And I hate the
realities of the hunger, humiliation, and injustice that is the
Occupation.
Two things that frame my relationship
to these people, one which
almost all of us internationals share, the other which is specific
to
the relatively small group of us that are Jewish. I've had a
strange
response to the sense of accomplishment that many of the
internationals feel. Heaven forbid that I in any way demean what
we
are doing here. It is important, and we need to consider how
we can
bring many more people here to stand in solidarity with the
Palestinian people. And we need to build small, temporary victories
into truly meaningful systemic change. But I think that the need
we
internationals have to feel that what we do is important is so
strong, that we sometimes forget two things: that these are only
tiny victories, and, most importantly, we all get to go home.
I
wonder if we give enough thought about what we are leaving behind
for
the people who have no choice but to go on living here. Only
those
who have the ability to stay here long-term can relate differently.
Would I stay if I could? I'm not sure, but probably not. Hard
as it
is to admit, and in all seriousness, I'm not as young as I used
to
be: my capabilities are limited, and I'm not sure I have what
is
most needed here. But all that aside, the reality is . . .
. . . that there is another piece that is even more difficult
for
me. As much as I have come to care about these people, in the
final
analysis, they are not my people, only my deeply valued cousins.
I
have no choice but to return to the other side of the real and
metaphorical green lines. I am painfully aware this week of the
relief I feel crossing back into Israel. I am glad that travel
is
easy and the challenges are limited to language barriers and
how much
a bus ticket or sherut (taxi) fare is. I am glad that I have
so many
more options of where to buy things, what to eat, where to find
an
inexpensive place to stay with a bed and clean sheets. I'm ashamed
at how difficult it is to be without these things, but I am also
furious that being Palestinian means being without these choices,
and
that supporting Palestinians requires me to be without them also.
In
many ways this trip is an extension of my last trip here a year
and a
half ago, and in some ways, since I am different, this trip is
different. I am, somehow, less romantic about what supporting
the
Palestinian cause is about. And I am afraid of the possibility
that
a realistic view of the situation will lead to a sense of cynicism
and, ultimately despair. But I am committed to not allowing that
to
happen. In the next couple of days I will cross the green line
and
rejoin the people with whom I feel most comfortable and among
whom
I have come to feel most uncomfortable. It's clear that my work
is
on both sides of the line, but mostly there.
May it be God's will that green
lines disappear, that cousins need
not feel guilt about their families, that there be no contradiction
in our reveling in our differences while sharing unhesitatingly
our
common roots.
6)Saturday, January 11, 2003
Martin R Federman
Journal 04
Saturday (Shabbat) was quiet:
stayed in Jerusalem, roamed the Old
City, gave time to my thoughts. Was in contact Saturday evening
with
ISM folk about how to re-connect with the Tulkarem group, which
was
actually back in Ras Attiya. Connected with Marcey Gayer, a New
Yorker who moved to Tel Aviv 25 years ago, then moved back to
New
York about seven years ago to care for her mother. She has two
grown
daughters living in Tel Aviv and, while Marcey is an unreconstructed
60's radical, her children are committed second-generation
Israeli yuppies. Anyway, Marcey is leaving in the next couple
of
days and wanted to go to Jenin to see some people and take photos
andthen hook up before she left with the Tulkarem folks. That
sounded OK to me since it would give me a chance to see Jenin
and
have someone who knows her way around to travel with.
Sunday, January 12, 2003
I was up Sunday morning at 4:30 a.m. in order to get a taxi to
the
Central Bus Station in Jerusalem, catch the 5:50 a.m. bus to
the Tel
Aviv Central Bus Station, and meet Marcey. [The Tel Aviv Station
is
quite something seven levels of buses with buses going in and
out all over. The terminal is much larger than Ben Gurian Airport,
and rivals the Port Authority in New York.] Our plan: go the
an
Israeli-Arab town Um al Fahd which is right on the green line,
cross
to the other side and get a taxi to the checkpoint at Jenin where
we
were to meet a Palestinian contact of Marcey's who would take
us into
and around Jenin.
The fun began as soon as we got
on the bus. The bus driver and
a few of the people around us were immediately
"interested" in why two Americans were taking a bus
to Um al Fahd.
We ignored the looks, took seats in the front, and began the
trip.
We picked up passengers, almost all of whom were well-armed
soldiers. I know that should have made me feel very secure,
but . . . At one point a young man (perhaps early twenties) got
on
and stood in the front steps well, right in front of us. He began
talking to us and he, too, wanted to know why we were going to
Um Al
Fahd and then Jenin. When Marcey told him we were human rights
workers he sneered and said "oh, don't you know, they're
not human."
At the Um al Fahd bus stop there
was a nice roadside café and we
stopped to get a bite, use the toilets, and get information about
how
best to get to Jenin. The owner of the café led us to
a corner
table, suggested we not talk quite as openly, and told us to
wait a
little while and he would take us to the border. By this time
we had
heard that there had been some disturbances in Jenin and it was
closed. Marcey called her contact (which was quite an ordeal
since
neither of our phones spoke to his!) who told us that he, as
a
Palestinian, would absolutely not be able to get in (even though
he
works there) but he had contacted a doctor friend who would send
a
Red Crescent Mobile Clinic Van to meet us and we would probably
be
able to get in. We decided to try, and after a significant drive
(for which the café owner would not take any payment:
"You're thanks are payment
enough" he told us in Hebrew), we were as
close to the crossing as he could get us. By the time he drove
away
we had already ascertained that the way we had intended to go
was
blocked, and only after a number of other calls did we decide
to
redirect to a small town called T'aibe where our van would,
hopefully, be waiting.
This only required our walking a few kilometers up the side of
one
large hill (small mountain?) and down the other into the valley
where
the town is. Finally we arrived at the crossing, and the van
was,
indeed, waiting for us with a lovely young man driving.
The Palestinian Medical Relief
Committees run clinics in different
villages each day where a doctor, two nurses, and a whole lot
of
supplies go to the village and set up business. Our driver took
us
to a village (whose name I never got) where a mostly mother/child
clinic was operating. We were to wait until all the patients
were
seen and then drive to Jenin with the medical team. Chairs were
put
out in a somewhat unkempt courtyard outside the clinic building,
we
were served coffee (and later tea), and we sat and talked with
the
men (some of them waiting husbands) that were around. Just some
of
the conversation:
The economic conditions in the
northern West Bank are
abysmal not unlike the great depression in the 1930's.
While we were there a farmer came by hawking oranges. He sells
10
kilos (that's about 22.something pounds?) for a few shekels (@
5
shekels to the dollar), we were told but no one has a few shekels
to buy them.
One man we spoke to is a construction
worker. He used to
make NIS 180/day (NIS is New Israel Shekels) working in Tel Aviv.
Now, if he can sneak in to Israel he may make NIS 120. The catch
is,
- if he's caught he's sent back;
- caught a second time he's sent back, almost always with a
beating;
- the third time he's detained for two weeks and fined NIS 1,000
- and if he's caught again within the next two years he's
jailed for
six months and fined NIS 5,000
So, the other option is, if there
is work in T'aibe, he can make
NIS 20/day.
An "older" man (maybe
35) noted the younger men sitting
around smoking. That's all they have to do, he told us, so they
begin to get involved in the religious movements, which seem
to give
some meaning to their lives. As the boredom and frustrations
build
they begin to feel that "this life is nothing but illusion"
so why
not shed it for the promise of paradise.
We were taken into a back room
where small bags of food are
stored. Families who need help can get a ration that consists
of a
few cans of beans, a little flour, and a bag (maybe five pounds)
of
rice. These rations are generally available every four months
or so.
The other part of the story is the children the remarkably
happy little children, who, in a short time will begin to exhibit
all
the mental health symptoms that are so endemic to this place.
Finally the clinic is closed
and we are led inside where a feast of
humus, felafel, fresh vegetables, three kinds of flat bread,
dips,
sauces and . . . are laid out for us. We eat, talk to the doctor
and
nurses, and finally are on our way to Jenin.
Not long into the trip we meet
two Israeli APC's. Our driver
stops, takes everyone's ID cards and passports and walks the
100
meters or so to the soldiers, who have us all get out of the
van,
which is searched as we are questioned. Finally we are allowed
to
continue.
A while later, at a muddy crossroads, we are again stopped, this
time
by a tank (with cannon fixed on us) and soldiers with guns aimed
at
us. They push us back, won't let us pass. At this confrontation
I'm actually frightened. Marcey & I join the driver, who
is talking
to the soldiers, and speak to them in Hebrew. After a while they
agree to let us pass, but we must wait, we're not exactly sure
why.
(Don't forget that the doctor, three nurses, and the driver all
live
in Jenin.) While we wait, locals that are trying to get home
are
turned away. One elderly man is told he can't go on because "even
if we let you pass, the soldiers up ahead might shoot you."
So, for
his protection he won't be let through. At last another APC and
a
jeep arrive and want to know what's going on. The soldiers in
the
tank have all our papers. After some further conversation between
the soldiers, our id's are returned, we are told that we can
go on,
and we begin our final approach to Jenin.
As we drive I notice that there
is a considerable amount of Hebrew on
the stores and buildings, and I'm told that this was once an
area
that many Israelis used come back and forth to, mostly to buy
local
products (carpentry, ceramics, building supplies, etc.).
It's obvious as we approach Jenin that parts of the city must
once have been quite beautiful. We enter by a wide divided kind
of
boulevard later we will find out that most of the municipal
buildings were on this road but they were all destroyed by the
Israeli military. The road itself, and the area around it, was
clearly a showplace at one time, but now it shows only the effects
of
neglect and the indifference of tanks. We are taken through part
of
the city of Jenin, at first I'm not sure if this is the refugee
camp I will learn soon to distinguish the two.
It is now fully nine hours since
I left Jerusalem this morning.
We're taken to the offices of the Palestinian Medical Relief
Committee, (PMRC) and introduced to our host, Dr. Jamil Khanis
Al-
Hamad, a refined, quiet man who directs the PMRC in the Jenin
district. After taking care of my foot, and some more tea, our
driver takes us to the camp which we can easily identify when
we are there. During the Israeli action in the spring of 2001
400
homes were completely demolished and another 600, while left
standing, were left uninhabitable. As you go through the streets
you
can still see the vast open spaces, now covered with rocks and
stones, where building used to stand, as well as the clear effects
of both house to house fighting and aerial attack. That's one
of the
things that is most striking the military said that house-to-house
casualties were a result of the decision to not use a lot of
aerial
fire, but, even in the city, the signs of the air attack are
everywhere.
There is little disagreement,
even among Palestinians I talked to,
that Jenin, especially the refugee camp, is a center of a certain
amount of armed resistance. I won't argue the validity of
Palestinian armed resistance in general, nor would I deny
Israel's right to go after the perpetrators of terrorism if the
Palestinian Authority can't do it (and I won't even raise here
the
question of whether Israel itself has made the PA's ability to
function non-existent). It is, none-the-less, almost impossible
for
me to see any justification for the level of destruction in Jenin.
Given the number of houses destroyed, the destruction of public
buildings in Jenin City, the way in which streets, utilities,
and
buildings were damaged by the tank assaults, one can only deduce
that
there was much more than rooting out terrorists in the goals
of this
operation. And, given the reality that there is no one to offer
any
compensation or support for rebuilding, an action of this nature
can
only be perceived as a way to punish an entire population by
making
life miserable for them. As I drive around Jenin I cannot help
but
wonder who these people are that make the decisions that lead
to such
horrible consequences for human beings. (Later Dr. Hamad will
tell
us that after the siege Israeli military maps were found which
have
the area targeted outlined in red. This would not be so noteworthy
but for the fact that the maps were dated 1997.)
One jarring aspect of our tour
of the refugee camp is that the
children are not as friendly as the children in other places.
At one
point as we are walking a large crowd of kids gather around us.
This, in and of itself, is not unusual, nor is their obsession
with
having us take their pictures. But there is an aggressiveness
to
these children I haven't seen before. One kid wields a
frighteningly realistic-looking toy pistol, which he keeps jabbing
in
my face and in front of the camera; another grabs my camera lens,
while others are trying to unhook my cell phone and get into
my waist
pack: one does manage to almost liberate my handkerchief from
a back
pocket. And, for the first time since I've been here, children
ask
us for money, becoming belligerent when we don't respond. Our
driver
helps push them back and get us into the van, and, as we drive
away,
some of them are shouting things that, despite my complete lack
of
facility with Arabic, I imagine I understand.
After our tour we are brought
to a beautiful new combination
apartment house, residential hotel. The idea was for tourists
and
businessmen to have a comfortable place to stay for a while.
Of
course no one comes to Jenin for enjoyment or business any more,
so
the building in mostly empty. A friend of Dr. Hamad's owns it
and he
has arranged for us to stay in one of the apartments for the
night.
We are ushered into two-bedroom flat with an efficiency kitchen,
and
a small sitting area with sofa, table and chairs, and a high-tech
TV
with cable! Although we plead stuffidness, Dr. Hamad insists
on
sending our driver out for some pita, cheese, and fruit, while
he
prepares tea for us.
We sit for some hours talking
with Dr. Hamad. He tells us about his
work with the Relief Committees and then we ask him about the
situation in and around Jenin. He professes not to be a politician
and, therefore, hesitant to comment, but he is almost eloquent
in his
quiet, but obviously passionate beliefs. He speaks of the need
for
peace and the fact that the Palestinians don't really wish ill
towards the Israelis, they just want to be left alone to live
their
lives. But he acknowledges that some of the suicide bombers have
come from Jenin, and that the resistance is very strong here.
He
also talks about the condition Palestinian men find themselves
in,
without jobs, income, or ways of supporting themselves and their
families. As economic and living conditions decline, despair
soars,
people value life less and are more ready to fight and even die.
This, of course, is not the first time we have heard this, but
here
Dr. Hamad adds an observation that is startling in its honesty
and
revealing in what it says about the depth of feelings here. He
tells
us that he makes a very good living by Palestinian standards,
able to
have nice clothes, a very nice car, a good place for his family
to
live but, he says, "I don't know, if I were to lose
these things, how far I would be from that point of despair."
O