![]() |
BostontoPalestine
|
||
|
Home Contact Current Delegation Past Delegations Events
|
John Petrovato is a bookseller from Western Massachusetts. He is a dedicated activist in the struggle for social justice. He is currently participating to the ISM's Olive Harvest Campaign
John's reports:
6) School Run in Nablus Early evening under a starry
sky in the scarred city of Nablus, So for the children of the camps
who attend school in the city, the At this point we noticed that
further up the road another jeep had We decided then to relocate to
the major checkpoint which divides the This was one checkpoint, in one
city, on one day of the occupation of ************************************* 5) The Difficulties of "Normal
Life" for Palestinians Understanding life under military occupation requires more than documenting and observing major incidents such as military strikes and operations. While these things should never be ignored, so much violence is perpetrated by the Israeli occupational regime in the "everyday," in so-called "normal" life. Indeed, the difficulties of "normal life" for Palestinians is something which most Americans could never imagine. Beyond daily violence by the illegal settler population against Palestinian civilians; curfews and closures encompassing entire cities as collective punishment for the acts of a few individuals; barricaded roads and military check-points restricting travel to those with Israeli passports; civilians detained and tortured for speaking-up to the military or engaging in a non-violent demonstration; humiliation; etc. Many Israeli's have told me very openly that the intention of Israel is not peace, but acquisition of the West Bank. That it was "God's will" and they are in the process of implementing it. The "Arabs" (most Israeli's call Palestinians "Arabs" so to indicate no special privilege to the land) are being forced to leave by such military and economic oppression and Israel is actively transferring its own population into this occupied territory. Many Palestinians will leave for Jordan because opportunities and a better life. Others say they will never leave Palestine and believe that if they can just withstand this brutality, the world will eventually awake and they will be granted a state. Below is an account of what "normal life" entails for an average day. These are a few incidents which I encountered while staying and speaking with individuals in the West Bank community of the Balata Refugee camp (outside of Nablus) on November 4th, 2002. 1) In early morning it was discovered that a Palestinian friend of ours was picked up by the military for not carrying his identification card. The identification card is basically a passport (with photo and information) which Palestinians are required to carry at all times (in their own country!) Muhammed and a friend of his were picked up and brought to a military base outside of Nablus. A few hours later, his friend was released and told us of the beatings he and Muhammed endured while they were detained. Muhammed was not released (for reasons unknown to us) and we were concerned because of a medical condition he has which can lead to death if he receives regular blows to the head. Three of us went to the military base in which he was being held and received no assistance. They informed us that "no hostages or prisoners were being held on the base". After a few hours of attempting to receive cooperation, we noticed a military vehicle leaving the compound with Muhammed inside - blindfolded. We inquired about why the military lied to us about holding him and they said that we were mistaken and that there were not prisoners in such a vehicle. However, after we called a human-rights lawyer from Israel, who contacted the military base, we found out that it was indeed him and that he has been moved to military prison about 20 km west of Nablus. This is an important story to tell because it relates to the fact that hundred of Palestinians are regularly held in prison (they can be detained for up to 90 days without being charged). The family of the person detained has no legal recourse to find out where such a person is held or why they were detained. Because we were internationals and hired an Israeli lawyer, we had been able to obtain a little bit of information. Palestinian families would have to worry about whether the person detained was alive or dead and what kinds of torture endured (torture is not here being used in a loose fashion -- Israel has been constantly reprimanded by the international community and human rights organizations for their use of torture in both military and police prisons). 2) A few hours earlier I had met a man who was originally from a village which is now part of Israel. He was forced to leave his home in 1948 when the UN created the state of Israel. He has not been allowed to return to home in these 54 years and now lives with his extended family in a "refugee camp" (which was also created by the UN to accommodate the hundreds of thousands of refugees). Refugee camps are in reality towns. Balata refugee camp has over 30,000 residents cramped into a very small space. Because people had to flee without belongings and had no land, they remain, for the most part, poor. 3) A military closure has been implemented throughout the Nablus area. While curfew was already imposed in the evenings, now travel between towns is impossible even during day light. Schools and factories closed, people cannot travel to medical appointments and the like. Basically, the area is turned into a group of islands maintained by military checkpoints where tanks and other armored vehicles enforce them. 4) Also during the early hours of the morning, tanks had rolled through the camp with machine guns firing into the air. For what purpose? What else but to terrorize the civilian population. Such usually occurs between 2 a.m. and 5 a.m. in the morning. When this happens one can here the cries of fearful children from near and far. Such psychological warfare is also a daily occurrence here. 5) Due to a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv, Israel responded with 2 military strikes in the Nablus area. One by the university, the other just a mile or so away from where i was staying in the Balata refugee camp. A factory had been destroyed by an Apache helicopter because it was supposedly "producing weapons". Of course one might find it suspicious that such a strike occurred against a factory producing so-called weapons at this moment, as opposed to dealing with it earlier if they had information of such. In any case, the fire was blazing and the fire department was not allowed to the site. It was called a military operation and no fire vehicles or ambulances were allowed in the area. Firefighters stood helpless awaiting the okay from the Israeli military to respond. Meanwhile, it was rumored that a group of women were trapped in an apartment building next door to the demolished building and not allowed to leave. A plan was devised to respond to this crises. 25 delegates for the International Solidarity Movement walked in front of the fire engines and medical teams to the site of the fire (to protect them from a military attack on them) so we could monitor the situation. As we approached the fire, a military vehicle sped out toward us at a very aggressive speed. We approached them and knocked on their windows and attempted to talk with them, but they would have none of it. Instead they would continuously drive into the crowd of internationals to try and disperse us. Finally, out of frustration, they went to the fire truck and told them "if you don't leave, you will be shot". The fire department had to retreat, for it is believed that the military would indeed follow through with the threat (the firemen, after all, are Palestinians). The fire department had to wait many hours into the night to receive permission to put the fire out. These few examples, i hope, illustrate
some of the daily occurrences here in Palestine as perpetrated
by the illegal Israeli military occupation. I apologize for the
fact that it is extremely difficult for me to articulate how
the occupation affects the lives of these civilians. I just hope
that people will try to imagine what it would be like if their
country, their communities, and their friends and family had
to endure such things on a daily basis and how the international
community, as a whole, has neglected serious interest in responding
to such. This occupation is not for "security reasons",
but for the acquisition of land. And, as such, it represents
a crime against humanity -- a crime which people of conscience
can no longer afford to accept. 4) November 2nd, 2002 Daily humiliation at check-points
I visited Nablus University today, a modern institution which just re-opened after 4 months due to the city-wide curfew imposed by the Israeli occupying forces. Over 6,000 students attend this institution (54% women/ 46% men) which specializes in hard sciences such as engineering, chemistry, and medicine. While many of the students lived in areas close enough to the university to get there even during curfew (which was dangerous), they had decided to stay closed because of Israeli snipers on the hillside outside of the city who would occasionally shoot into the courtyards of the school. Today, however, after 4 months of curfew, the school is reopened and there is an amazing air of excitement on behalf of the students as they are finally able to resume studies. (Palestinians, by the way, have one of the highest percentages of college educated adults in the world). After leaving the university, I along with 3 ISM delegates attempted to accompany a Palestinian friend to his home in Far'a refugee camp about 15 Km northeast of Nablus. It used to take about 20 min. to travel between these 2 places, but military check-points have made the trip take between 2 - 4 hours; Palestinians are not allowed to use any major road and have to spend much time awaiting permission to pass through check points. About 15 minutes into our journey we encountered a military check-point outside the village of Deir Sharaf. The check-point had just been established an hour earlier and we were told that the entire Nablus area was under curfew due to the arrest of 4 Palestinians caught transporting explosives. Thus, no civilian movement into or out of the city would be allowed. Standing at the check-point were university students, mothers holding infants, professionals, and others on their way home. People were obviously irritated by such closure, though they seem somewhat used to it. The four internationals of the ISM (from Nicaragua, Northern Ireland, Lithuania, and the United States) attempted to negotiate with the soldiers to allow people through. As we approached the soldiers, I noticed that other soldiers were occupying military vehicles and pointing machine guns at us. One by one the internationals attempted to negotiate, but without much luck. The soldiers claimed that the complete curfew and road closures had to do with "security reasons" and that any one of the people standing at the check point is a suspected "terrorist." First they demanded that everyone pass through a military checkpoint outside the town of Huwara. Then they told us to merely return to Nablus. Most people did not move. Some stood around talking, others sat down in apparent resistance. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, the soldiers began letting people cross. First, they allowed women and children to cross, later some of the men. One wonders what the "security risk" is when they allow people to cross the check-point without checking their bags. I believe that one can make the assumption that what happens at such check points has to do with "power." For instance, the soldiers would demand that people move back 20 meters. Then they would allow some to pass. Then they would make another demand, which might result in "rewarding" people for their obedience. During this time, however, the Palestinians would be forced not only to accept these demands, but also to stand in straight lines and keep conversation to a minimum. One Palestinian at a time would be called to the soldiers (who keep their machine guns pointed at the approaching person at all times). The soldiers would ask: "Where are you coming from? What business did you attend to in Nablus?" Then they would say "I will allow you through today, but do not come through here tomorrow -- you see that I am doing you a favor". Such use of military force by an occupying army results in humiliation. The Palestinian culture, which is one of the least violent (violent crimes are minimal, as with other crimes such as theft, etc. - besides the point that they are unarmed) and most friendly which I have encountered, has to endure such humiliating demands on a daily basis. After a short time the military, just as soon as they began to allow people through, decided that no more would cross -- including us. While they usually allow foreigners the privilege of not having to endure the humiliation that they impose on the Palestinians, they would not allow us to pass because "we angered them with our questions.ä We were being punished because we inquired about the process, as well as having shown solidarity with the Palestinians. We began to make our way back to Nablus as night fell. While the ISM delegates would be allowed in theory to roam the streets of Nablus, the Palestinian gentlemen we were traveling with would be in quite serious danger of arrest (and beating while held in prison which is the norm). We were lucky to find a taxi driver who agreed to take us into the city. The overcrowded taxi sped through the streets as we attempted to get into the city center before night fell. We were dropped at a hotel in the city just as we began hearing gun shots being fired in the near distance. The hotel we were dropped at
in Nablus has a policy of giving ISM delegates a discount so
to make it affordable under such situations. Such generosity
has been common on the part of taxi drivers, hotels, and even
restaurants who give either free or discounted fares to "internationals"
of the ISM. This is amazing to me since these people, after all,
are quite poor and living under very stressful conditions.
But such generosity and hospitality is the norm here. As such,
working here for people who are really appreciative that internationals
come here to observe what is happening makes our work much more rewarding. 3) October 30-31th, 2002 Stolen Land in Salfit District- -John Petrovato- 10/30/02 Yesterday, harvesters were attacked
by the Israeli occupying forces Salfit is in a particularly difficult
area. The district of Salfit The legal rights of settlers
and Palestinians are different. At 6 P.M., we twelve ISM delegates
arrived in Salfit. We met with: Unemployment is another problem
associated with the occupation, with For today's harvest work, the
Internationals (ISM) broke up into The day went along quietly, with
the exception of the annoying and The day finished with no attacks
on the harvesters. So, it was a
This report is from the Boston-area
delegation to the International 2) October 27th, 2002 NEGOTIATING THE OLIVE HARVEST After couple of successful olive harvests in the village of Yasuf, more difficulties have ensued. The military constantly changes decisions about where the villagers can harvest and whether there will be protection for them if they do so. On Monday, October 21st, the army informed us that we could harvest, only to find out on our arrival at the road block at 6 in the morning to find out that the military has closed the area. The IDF assured the villagers that in following days the [Olive harvesting] area would reopen and protection [from settlers] would be given. We believe such assurances are weak, but Palestinian villagers felt they had little choice and agreed to accept the military's offer. Our group then traveled from Yasuf to Yanun. There were unconfirmed reports that settlers in that area had occupied houses and burned some of them down. It was also said that they had destroyed the power generator for the village. On the way to the town we encountered a military checkpoint. The soldiers recognized us as "internationals" from Yasuf. They refused to speak English to us and told our driver that we couldn't pass because we "were seen throwing stones at the settlers" (an incredible lie). Thus we had to take a different route, far out of our way, passing on long, almost impassable dirt roads. It took us over an hour to get there when it normally takes twenty minutes. Upon arriving at Yanun, we met a group of residents who told us of the recent settler violence. They said "thank you for coming," "please tell the world what you see here," and "tell the truth, there is no reason to lie, the truth is enough," along with the familiar plea that they don't want to be seen as terrorists. On arriving in the village center, we found a media circus and dozens of activists. Some activists were protecting houses from being re-occupied and others were documenting the situation. We got out of the buses and strategized. As with all actions, the ISM does not take the lead in determining an action/response. While we may make suggestions, we don't propose courses of action without the consent of the people we are working with. We believe that the Palestinians should decide what they want to do and we make it clear to them that we will respect any decision they make....even if the decision were to lead to arrest or beatings for ourselves. Near Yanun we met a gentleman who had just witnessed his fields being cleared and tilled by settlers. We discussed actions: he told me that he did not want us to occupy the land as I suggested but would rather go through legal channels to fight it. About this time, twenty military police showed up on the scene and proceeded to guard the settlers from any action we might have took. The owner of the land yelled out "you have no right being on this land" and the response by the settler was "god gave this land to the Jews". The owner responded that his father gave this land to him. We managed to work out a deal with the military where we would be "allowed" to harvest some of the fields that this gentleman owned as long as it wasn't close to where the settlers were seizing the land! We picked olives for most of the day. VILLAGER LEADS DEFIANCE OF ARMY AT YASUF The next day, we met again at the road block leading out of Yasuf to harvest olive trees and the military informed us that, because of a suicide bombing the evening before north of Tel Aviv, all olive harvesting "anywhere in the West Bank" was prohibited. People were furious but most accepted the order. Then one lone gentleman tried to enter his fields. Soldiers jumped in front of him telling him to leave or be arrested. With amazing courage, the gentleman pushed his way past the soldier and, along with me and a couple of other ISM delegates, walked with into his fields. The soldier did nothing. After a few minutes, a few more families did the same and with the assistance of about 15 internationals the villagers were able to put a good day in harvesting the fields. Toward mid-afternoon the military
officer informed us that the rest of the fields would be opened.
As soon as we left the farmers, the army moved in and tried to
forcibly remove them. We had, it seems, been bluffed into believing
the army's promise of opening the fields. We had to run back
to the site and made sure that the harvesters would be able to
collect their equipment and pickings without intimidation. The military was there, of course,
making sure that we were not going to attack the settlements.
They often have a tank on the hillside with its barrel facing
the center of Yasuf. When we ask them why they respond "we
are protecting the villagers of Yasuf." On Friday, three people from my affinity group traveled to the Balata refugee camp outside of Nablus. Though only 14 kilometers away, the journey took us over 2 hours. We encountered two military check points where no Palestinian vehicle could pass. So we had to take cabs in between them and walk through them. At one check point, the soldier was suspicious that we were filming him and he approached us in a very aggressive manner and tried to grab a camera from us. When we resisted, he said "I am the law, you shut your mouth." In Nablus the military has just lifted its 24 hour curfew which lasted over 3 months. The curfew is now in effect at night only. The city is devastated. Everywhere is a sea of destruction. Telephone poles knocked into the middle of the streets, bullet holes on the sides of buildings, tank tracks on pavement, houses demolished, etc. Upon leaving Nablus, we traveled to Jami'ia, a village of about 10,000 outside Yasuf. We went there to investigate reports that an olive harvester had been repeatedly fired on by the settlers. We met with the harvester and after an interview, decided that we needed to dispatch a team of at least 5 ism delegates there the following day. John Petrovato
1) 10/16 and 10/17, 2002 Report composed after phone calls from John (to Ben) and from Susan (to Ken) Wednesday, 10/16/02 Testing the Waters - Yasuf village, West Bank This morning, villagers from Yasuf and 13 internationals from the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) walked to the olive orchards located near the Israeli settlement, Tapuac. On the way to the olive orchards we heard gunshots, and soon people were running toward us, warning us that the settlers were shooting-from a nearby hilltop. We internationals headed toward the gunshots and made visual contact with a handful of settlers. They stood on the hill above us with their machine guns, shooting over the heads of the Palestinians harvesting in the fields. We tried to speak to them, saying, "We are here in peace." They said, "We are here in peace too," then threw rocks at us and fired shots over our heads. The military and the police arrived and detained (arrested?) a settler who, in full view of the soldiers, had fired his rifle and hit a rock about twenty feet away from us. The Palestinians were nearby, yelling to the soldiers that they needed to harvest their olives. The soldiers said they were leaving but that they were declaring this a closed military zone and that the police would arrive soon to arrest us. We were quietly sitting in a line. One of us tried to negotiate with the soldiers, to no avail. The military them forced the villagers to leave, actively pushing many of them. We held our ground, then finally decided to leave for the day. In the evening we met with the villagers and talked about what to do next. They told us that nothing had worked, so far. The village is surrounded by settlements that take more of its land each year. The villagers are prevented from harvesting, but if the villagers don't harvest the orchards, the land is ruled "unused" and is confiscated by the settlers. We began talking about how we could return to the fields tomorrow, for a major harvest action. The feeling of solidarity was powerful, with peasants (in modern and traditional dress), young and old trading ideas with the internationals and Israeli peace activists. The villagers were risking a lot, but they were willing to take a chance and follow our recommendation to do a direct action. This was to be a totally nonviolent action-no stone throwing, and completely peaceful and silent. We told the Palestinian villagers
we were willing to risk injury or arrest if they thought this
would help. But the villagers told us, "We won't let you
do this alone, and we will be with you even if it comes to beatings
and arrests." This is a huge risk for them. For most of
us, we had never in our lives seen anything quite like Thursday, 10/17/02 Action and Victory It was time to proceed with this well-planned major harvest action. The participants included: about 400 Palestinians from the village; 16 internationals-13 ISMs and 3 women from IWPS (the International Women's Peace Service); plus 8 Israeli activists (some of them from Rabbis for Human Rights). The plan was for this large number of villagers to carry out major harvesting work today--to be shielded from the settlers by the internationals and the Israeli peace activists. The settlers had been raiding the olive groves, preventing the Palestinians from getting to their fields and groves, and annexing more and more Palestinian land to their settlement. We awoke at about 6 A.M. and met the villagers at the roadblock leading to their fields. There were about 400 villagers. There was enormous anticipation in the air-it had a been a long time since they had been able to visit these fields, because of the great danger. The villagers started to separate, going down the slopes to their family plots. We had planned to stay together for safety reasons, but the Palestinians moved ahead in this manner because they felt that this might be their last chance to visit their land. We soon found out that we were
encountering bands of armed settlers - total 16. And there was
NO sign of any soldiers or police officers - no protection whatsoever.
The planners of today's action had received direct assurances
that there would be formal Israeli protection for this harvesting
today. The assurances had been given by the local Israeli civil
administration and by the commanding officer of the local IOF.
The group felt that we had been set up. The American Consulate
in Jerusalem was immediately contacted, but it took them almost
an hour before they made a substantial reply-saying that they
had finally made calls to Israeli officials in the area. (Presumably
they made such calls.) At one point a settler was aiming
his gun at a crowd of Palestinians. One of us shouted to one
of the soldiers, "Arrest him!" The soldier replied,
"He is allowed to aim his gun at others as long as he does
not shoot." The soldier did nothing. So an elderly Israeli
peace activist moved in front of the settler's gun. Every time
a settler pointed his gun at someone, this seventy year old man
would stand in front of it, with the barrel pointed at his chest.
Actually, we did see one soldier put himself squarely between
a settler's gun barrel and a villager. Later, other soldiers
arrived. The villagers were beginning to carry out the
plan. They sat down, silently-their message: "We are absolutely
in control and unafraid." The Israeli commander told us
The experience today represents
a victory. But, of course, there is still no real assurance that
the Israeli authorities and military can be expected to provide
ongoing adequate protection for Palestinians. (These particular
settlers happen to be the fanatic rightwing-ideology variety,
but such behavior and policy is the rule all over Palestine.)
This village, with its population of 1700 people, has had no
success whatsoever in resisting the violence of the settlers
and stopping the annexation of their land. This is the first
thing that has worked for them. The word is already spreading.
An added note. Today was the 7th anniversary of Rabin's This report is from the Boston-area
delegation to the International Solidarity Movement's Olive Harvest
Campaign. One hundred Internationals are arriving now in the
rural West Bank, to accompany Palestinians defying settlers and
military curfews to harvest olives, the lifeblood of Palestine's
rural economy and symbol of traditional Palestinian life. The
presence of Internationals reduces the threat of violence from
settlers and the military, and assists the Palestinians in their
resistance to Israeli land-theft and occupation. For more information: International Solidarity Movement:
www.palsolidarity.org
|